Reviews of Merry Christmas, Mr. Lawrence 

¡¡

 < BACK

Review 1
by Kevin Thomas
Los Angeles Times, August 25, 1983; Calendar/p 1

     There is scarcely anything merry about "Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence," a drama of life in a Japanese concentration camp in Java that is insufficiently convincing or illuminating to justify its two-hour display of ceaseless brutality. A film of undeniable but unsteady power, of style and even stark beauty, it is flawed fatally in various ways, not least by a streak of sentimentality that is ever the reverse side of cruelty.
     In his English-language debut-actually, about half the film is in Japanese with English subtitles- director Nagisa Oshima depicts violence as obsessively as he did sex in "In the Realm of the Senses," but with even less justification.
     Japanese film makers have frequently dealt with the frenzied, sadistic excesses of the Japanese military during World War II, and far more effectively than in this film-the first example that comes to mind is Masaki Kobayashi's nine-hour, three-part anti-war masterpiece "The Human Condition."      However, "Merry Christmas, Mr. Lawrence," which Oshima adapted with Paul Mayersberg from a Laurens van der Post novel, may be the first film directed by a Japanese to show atrocities against Allies prisoners of war - at least so extensively. We can only wish that if we're to submit to such a grueling display or candor, that we be better rewarded.
     A Japanese-British co-production, "Merry Christmas, Mr. Lawrence" was filmed largely in Rarotonga in the Cook Islands.
     Oshima wastes no time in letting us know what we're in for. A Korean guard, having sodomized a Scandinavian prisoner of war and been severely beaten for it, is expected to commit hara-kiri. He botches it and lives, much to our surprise, to try again.
     Whippings, clubbings and kickings are chronic in this tropical camp, whose latest arrival is a defiant British daredevil (David Bowie), who surrendered but is on trial for his life because the Japanese are convinced he is a member of an advance party for a British invasion. But he is spared by the camp's young commandant (Ryuichi Sakamoto) because he is instantly and profoundly attracted to Bowie, and, one would suspect, not just for his bravado.
     At the heart of the matter-and wherein the film is most effective-is a clash of values so intense as to render the Japanese and their British prisoners incomprehensible to each other. At the center of this conflict-the film's true star-is Tom Conti, in the title role as a Japanese-speaking British liaison officer who spent some time in Japan before the war.
     If Bowie is meant to be the film's heroic figure, then Conti is its persistent humanitarian-a generation ago the late Leo Genn would have had the part (and probably did). Sakamoto is its rigid, tradition- worshipping samurai aristocrat, aptly described by Conti as a man "trying to become a superhuman god." The film's Everyman is a stocky Japanese sergeant (Takeshi). Jack Thompson, the British prisoners' commanding officer, is an arrogant, hotheaded John Bull with wonderfully squeaky shoes-as soon as you hear approaching, you begin counting on him to make each crisis worse.
     "I would admire you more if you killed yourself," Takeshi says to Conti, who tries to explain that in the British view there's no shame in being taken prisoner. And when Sakamoto orders Conti put to death because a forbidden radio has been discovered. Sakamoto does not deny Conti's accusation that he knows full well he had nothing to do with the radio and goes on to explain that it does not matter. An example must be set.
     Yet all these clashes, once the heat of the moment has passed, tend to be blunted. The impassioned, intellectual Conti, deservedly heralded as one of the major British actors of the day, has by far the best written part, but much that astonishes and horrifies him in the course of the film smacks of exposition; surely, someone we have every right to assume would be familiar with the samurai code would scarcely be surprised by the brutal harshness of it application.
     There are lengthy flashbacks to Bowie's youth, explaining his guilt over his betrayal of his younger brother-and also allowing Oshima to contrast the savagery of a British public-school hazing with the behavior of the Japanese military. Through the flash-backs we may better understand Bowie's recklessness and downright masochism, but we see nothing in the past or present to substantiate the oft-repeated claim that he is a born leader.
     Sakamoto, one of Japan's most popular recording artists who is making his acting debut, might better have confined himself to the composition of the film's striking synthesizer score, the picture's strongest asset. Sometimes barely intelligible in his phonetic-sounding English, his entire presence and appearance remind one, believe it or not, of Nita Naldi's haughty, sinister silent-screen vamps. In lesser roles both Thompson and Takeshi fare better, but Takeshi is stuck with having to play out the film's maudlin epilogue.
     That none of this interaction is as persuasive as it ought to be makes it a poor check to all the surrounding violence. Indeed, the whole handling of the film's incessant brutality is further undermined by Conti's and Bowie's apparent capacity to absorb as much punishment as cartoon characters. In one scene they may appear near death from beatings, yet in the next seem fully recovered. As a result the film seems morbidly preoccupied with violence for its own sake.
     There's no denying Oshima's expressiveness and passion, but in his convention-defying rebelliousness an fiery protest he has always been more uneven than Shohei Imamura and Masahiro Shinoda, who also emerged in the 60s but remain less known to moviegoers at large because neither has had a film that generated the sensational publicity of "In the Realm of the Senses."
     Alongside "Boy," perhaps Oshima's masterpiece (inspired by a true story of a child trained to be the victim of car accidents for extortion purposes and a film that is charged with an existentialist recognition of the absurdities and injustices of life), "Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence" (rated R for all the bone-crunching) seems pretty specious-and never more so than in the postwar epilogue when Conti tells Takeshi that "nobody's right."
     Balderdash: The bombing of Pearl Harbor was wrong: we were right in our response, and innumerable Japanese films of far less pretensions than this one have been acknowledging it for years.

Review 2
by David Denby
New York, September 12, 1983, p 80

     Nagisa Oshima's Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence is one of those formal, blood-stained, misterioso art jobs from Japan, filled with solemn rituals, symbolic flowers, repressed homo-erotic tensions, and dishonored men quivering with shame. It is quite hysterical and, at times, almost completely baffling. Based on a novel by Laurens van der Post, the South African-born novelist who lives in England, it seems to have something to do with differing national traditions of honor. At a Japanese prison camp on Java in 1942, the commander, a young samurai type (rock star Ryuichi Sakamoto, who has a beautiful forehead), and his brutal sergeant try to break the spirit of two British officers-a gentle humanist, played by Tom Conti, who keeps getting based on the noggin with bamboo clubs only to pick himself up and make civilized, rueful remarks, and an indomitable hero who can take any kind of punishment, played by David Bowie.
     Looking blissfully happy at moments when the rest of us would be whimpering in misery, Bowie, who gelid blondness seems more otherworldly than ever, delivers a long monologue in which we discover the cause of his heroism: Years ago, in his native New Zealand, he refused to defend his kid brother, a tiny hunchback, when a huge group of nasty fellows were standing around jeering at the boy. Thus, he has resolved never to betray anyone again. This scene, shown in flashback, is staged so poorly that one can only giggle at it, and the same is true of an episode in which a Japanese soldier, failing a mission, commits hara-kiri as casually as someone else might remove a hat. Indeed, the whole movie is so clumsy that we can't help noticing that both guards and prisoners have nothing else to do in this camp but play obscure psychological tricks on one another. At least in the David Lean-Alec Guiness-Sessue Hayakawa version they built that bridge.

Review 3
by Janet Maslin
The New York Times, August 26, 1983, C10:1

     David Bowie plays a born leader in Nagisa Oshima's "Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence," and he plays him like a born film star. Mr. Bowie's screen presence here is mercurial and arresting, and he seems to arrive at this effortlessly, though he manages to do something slyly different in every scene. The demands of his role may sometimes be improbably and elaborate, but Mr. Bowie fills them in a remarkably plain and direct way. Little else in the film is so unaffected or clear.
     "Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence," which opens today at the Baronet and the Bay Cinema, is sometimes merely bizarre. It's an intriguing if inconsistent effort, by the director of "In the Realm of the Senses," to use a Japanese-run prisoner-of-war camp as a means of exploring the bewildering nature of war. In Java, in 1942, the British lieutenant colonel of the title (Tom Conti) is reunited with Jack Celliers (Mr. Bowie), a major from New Zealand whose powers of self-control and defiance seem to know no bounds. Lawrence, who understands his Japanese captors far better than any of his comrades do, must look on in helpless understanding as they marvel at Celliers's remarkable strength of spirit and ultimately respond to it with a savagery and fear.
     "They're a nation of anxious people, and they could do nothing individually, so they went mad en masse," Lawrence says of the Japanese. The two main Japanese characters who have brought him to this understanding are Sergeant Hara (Takeshi), a brutal figure who taunts Lawrence while also admiring him, and Captain Yonoi (Ryuichi Sakamoto), the handsome young camp commander, who has a fierce belief in the samurai code. Both of these actors perform at an obvious disadvantage, since their English is awkward and the motives of their characters are imperfectly revealed. However, they are able to convey the complex affinity that exists between captors and prisoners, a point that is made most touchingly in a brief postwar coda.
     "Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence" can be brutal and blunt, not just in its scenes of hara-kiri (there are several of these) but in its occasionally stilted execution. The screenplay, by Mr. Oshima and Paul Mayersberg, has a curiously dislocated quality. Though it's based on a novel ("The Seed and the Sower") by Laurens van der Post, the film seems almost more Japanese in its New Zealand sequences than it does in the prison camp.
     These scenes, which are flashbacks to Celliers's boyhood, involve the way in which he feels he has wronged his brother, who is an angelic-looking blond boy with a beautiful singing voice and a hunchback. This exceedingly odd anecdote, more consistent with the film's code of honor than with Celliers's probable history, is most remarkable for Mr. Bowie's ability to stand side by side with a boy of 10 or so, both of them sporting school blazers, and somehow pass for a slightly older brother.
     Mr. Conti has some fine moments here, too, but his is the more passive and less mysterious role. He is also saddled with some of the film's more simplistic dialogue, and some of its more obscure responses. "Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence" is closer to a curiosity than to a triumph, though its conception is certainly ambitious. Mr. Oshima has staged the film in a spacious tropical setting and filled it with a great number of extras. Even so, Mr. Bowie always stands out from the crowd.

From www.stanford.edu

 < BACK