THE LADY AND THE DUKE (L'Anglaise et le duc)

Jeremiah Kipp

< BACK

The Lady and the Duke (L'Anglaise et le Duc) is written and directed by Eric Rohmer, the renowned French New Wave filmmaker and Cahier du cin¨¦ma critic. Based on Grace Elliott's memoir "Journal of My Life During the French Revolution", The Lady and the Duke reconstructs the Englishwoman's point of view narration. Lover and friend of the Duke of Orl¨¦ans (Jean-Claude Dreyfus), who is the cousin of King Louis XVI, Grace Elliot (Lucy Russell) is trapped in France during the Revolution and often puts her life at risk by voicing her royalist, anti-revolutionary views. Through her charm and friendship, she manages to persuade the Duke to help her plot the escape of an important political activist, yet she fails to dissuade him from supporting the King's execution.

The Lady and the Duke successfully establishes the two main characters' perspectives with subtle simplicity. Always the subject of a patient, mostly motionless camera, Grace slowly delivers her reactions to certain dramatic situations. In one scene, she witnesses how the staked head of Princess de Lamballe --her friend and the Duke's sister-in-law-- is paraded in the streets by "a gang of fanatics", and concludes: "Such horror is inexcusable!" ("C'est horreur est sans excuse!"). In another scene, she reflects on the risky experience of having hidden the outlaw/activist inside her bedroom, and she describes gracefully how she felt and justifies her moral commitment to helping the vulnerable man. Contrasting her political views, yet equal in his deliverance of them, the Duke explains to Grace that "[The Revolution], although terrible for us to witness, will be good for our children".

Aside from Rohmer's bold choices regarding point of view, The Lady and the Duke represents the filmmaker's lifelong concern with formalist experimentation in cinematic art. For The Lady and the Duke, he commissioned a series of paintings (based on other representations of the same period) and used them as sets for the film. Shooting the actors with a blue screen background, then using digital video technology to overlap the two planes, he gave the painted backgrounds three-dimensional life. Interestingly, Rohmer's use of modern technology recalls the classical style of theatrical staging, yet adds to the the flat paintings or "sets" a spatial function with which the characters interact. The result is an overall texture, enhanced by the photography's soft amber tones, that emphasizes the artificiality of the stage and that brings to the foreground the process of the reconstruction of the historical reality. Simultaneously (or consequently) this aesthetic/technical choice redefines the essence of the film as an artistic endeavor that, through its conscious departure from the mainstream conventions of the medium, explores and exposes its own devices. (In Cahiers du cin¨¦ma no. 44 [1955], Rohmer argues for "...a cinematic classicism, in terms that recall the 'synthetic' approach to defining film's essence..." [Bordwell, David. "On the History of Film Style." Harvard University Press, 1997].) Although the viewer may argue that Rohmer's denaturalization process weakens the realism of the historical accounts (and dismisses other technological possibilities of modern cinema), he or she will nevertheless be intrigued by the film's ability to evidence the "plasticity" of celluloid (and film art) and the medium's close ties to painting, theatre and color photography.

From www.cinephiles.net

< BACK